2016 CMRA Rule Book Posted!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jeremy Harvey

What changed/updated with Formula 2? I didn't see any differences.

---

I have a slightly older 2016 rulebook. Looks like they changed displacement, allowing up to 800cc twins w/o Desmodromic valves and 750 with minor limitations.

EDIT: looking at them now. F2 allows up to 800cc liquid cooled twin, but it did not before. That seems to be the main thing. Adds some detail about Desmodromic valves that wasn't there before.

749 just went up in value. Should be able to walk an SV with one of those.

I see it now. For some reason, the first time I tried to download the updated version, it wasn't the updated version.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jeremy Harvey

I see it now. For some reason, the first time I tried to download the updated version, it wasn't the updated version.

---

Browser cache.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Walter Walker

Lets not over think this folks. Does everyone remember KISS, KEEP IT SIMPLE STUPID!
These lights are all approved.

http://m.tmart.com/5-LED-F105-Safety...d_p124042.html

http://www.ebay.com/itm/1-5-Red-Mini...3D350630312603

http://www.amazon.com/Brightest-Rech...ike+tail+light

Here are the official Rain Light guidelines:

Light assembly must be securely mounted to the rear most point of the machines tail.

Light must be mounted and functional when machine is presented for technical inspection.

Light may be removed during dry conditions.

No OEM taillight assemblies.

Light may be self powered (internal battery) or connected the machines battery (must have an on/off switch if wired direct to the machine)

Light must illuminate solid red in color when powered on.

Light may not function as a brake light.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Walter Walker

Looks good Kasey!

---

With regard to "Light assembly must be securely mounted to the rear most point of the machines tail."
How does that under-tail mounting example, which is quite-far from the "rear most point of the machines tail", qualify as an acceptable mount point?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Greg Gilstrap

With regard to "Light assembly must be securely mounted to the rear most point of the machines tail."
How does that under-tail mounting example, which is quite-far from the "rear most point of the machines tail", qualify as an acceptable mount point?

---

Greg, I think the main idea behind it is that it must be mounted on the tail section on the bottom side and not be obstructed by the rear tire. I'm pretty sure anything around that is acceptable. I have seen a few people asking about installing them on their exhaust hanger or swing arm, I know that won't pass tech.

Example:
http://www.cmraracing.com/showthread...this-pass-tech

http://i411.photobucket.com/albums/p...psjxtldk94.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Greg Gilstrap

With regard to "Light assembly must be securely mounted to the rear most point of the machines tail."
How does that under-tail mounting example, which is quite-far from the "rear most point of the machines tail", qualify as an acceptable mount point?

---

I posted those guidlines early in the process but as things have progressed I decided to start looking at light placement on a case by case basis. Feel free to post a picture of your light placement for approval.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Matthew Crowe

http://i411.photobucket.com/albums/p...psjxtldk94.jpg

---

Different bike than I have but almost exact placement I went with.