ATTENTION ATTENTION ENDURANCE AND RELAY TEAMS AND ENDURANCE HOPFULS

[Ben Avila]

Hallett is my favorite! But, being in Austin I would never drive up there if there was not an endurance round to race there.

[David Branyon]

So... with the 20 entries at MSRH, Hallett ULWE is ON, right?? PLEASE!

[Dave Gallagher]

So... with the 20 entries at MSRH, Hallett ULWE is ON, right?? PLEASE!

Interested in this, as well....

[Kasey Lewis]

We had 16 for ULWE, that being said it's too close to the round for March to change i think. The second hallett can be looked at, and the cresson rounds. Teams budget and plan out a season, I'd hesitate to make too many changes. But we can check with those teams.

[David Branyon]

20 entries on the grid. Maybe not all technically ULWE, but I believe they all pay the same (or similar) so should count. Let's go!

[David Branyon]

We had 16 for ULWE, that being said it's too close to the round for March to change i think. The second hallett can be looked at, and the cresson rounds. Teams budget and plan out a season, I'd hesitate to make too many changes. But we can check with those teams.

Nobody's unhappy about adding a 5th endurance round! I mean, 4 rounds is just not enough! If we were talking adding an 8th or 9th round, I'd be more understanding of the "teams budget and we don't want to surprise them" line of thought. But 4-->5? No way is anyone gonna say, "5 rounds is just WAY too much! If I'd have known this, I never would have even started."

Imho.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

[John McKenzie]

I agree with David that we had 20 paying teams and all of them should count.

I understand that having a half-day paid practice on Saturday instead of endurance is likely to bring in more money for the club at certain tracks. However, we don't do this to pay for practice, we do it to race, so my opinion is that we should be racing if the numbers between the two options are close.